please select
Quality Counts
Introduction
Holding Schools Accountable
Challenges
Indicators
Focus Groups
On School Report Cards
State of the States
Report Cards
Policy Updates
Indicators

transparent.gif (43 bytes)
Contents
How To Order

Read Virginia's Policy Update.

Virginiatransparent.gif (43 bytes)

transparent.gif (43 bytes) REPORT CARD
transparent.gif (43 bytes)
transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes) NAEP
exams
% Scoring
proficient
  • 1996 8th grade math
  • 21%
  • 1996 4th grade math
  • 19%
  • 1996 8th grade science
  • 27%
  • 1994 4th grade reading
  • 26%
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes)
    QUALITY COUNTS
    1999 grades
    transparent.gif (43 bytes)
  • Standards and assessments
  • transparent.gif (43 bytes)A-

  • Efforts to raise teacher quality
  • School climate
  • D+
  • Resources (funding):
  • transparent.gif (43 bytes)
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Adequacy
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Equity
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Allocation D+
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes)

    A ccountability became real for Virginia's students last year, as the state administered new tests aligned with its Standards of Learning. Later this year, the state will release a list of low-performing schools based on how students performed on the exams. But high stakes won't kick in for a number of years. High school students won't have to pass end-of-course tests to graduate until 2004. And it will be 2007 before the state threatens to pull accreditation from low-performing schools. Meanwhile, the state will begin issuing report cards on individual schools this month. And starting next year, new teachers will have to have a stronger preparation in their subject.

    * NOTE: The equity grade is based on 1994-95 data, the most recent available.


    Vermont

    Washington

    Education Week
    on the Webplease select

    © 1999 Editorial Projects in Education

    Vol. 18, number 17, page 181