please select
Quality Counts
Introduction
Holding Schools Accountable
Challenges
Indicators
Focus Groups
On School Report Cards
State of the States
Report Cards
Policy Updates
Indicators

transparent.gif (43 bytes)
Contents
How To Order

Read Tennessee's Policy Update.

Tennesseetransparent.gif (43 bytes)

transparent.gif (43 bytes) REPORT CARD
transparent.gif (43 bytes)
transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes) NAEP
exams
% Scoring
proficient
  • 1996 8th grade math
  • 15%
  • 1996 4th grade math
  • 17%
  • 1996 8th grade science
  • 22%
  • 1994 4th grade reading
  • 27%
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes)
    QUALITY COUNTS
    1999 grades
    transparent.gif (43 bytes)
  • Standards and assessments
  • transparent.gif (43 bytes)D+

  • Efforts to raise teacher quality
  • B-

  • School climate
  • Resources (funding):
  • transparent.gif (43 bytes)
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Adequacy
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Equity
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Allocation
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes)

    T ennessee's standards fared poorly on ratings by the American Federation of Teachers, with the exception of those for middle school science. The state spent much of last year fine-tuning its reform program. It chose 11 subjects in which to give end-of-course tests in high school. Starting with students entering 9th grade in 2000, young people will have to pass tests in algebra, biology, and 10th grade English to graduate. Although the state has the authority to intervene in low-performing schools, so far it has taken a pass, choosing to focus on the performance of whole school districts.

    * NOTE: The equity grade is based on 1994-95 data, the most recent available.


    South Dakota

    Texas

    Education Week
    on the Webplease select

    © 1999 Editorial Projects in Education

    Vol. 18, number 17, page 175