please select
Quality Counts
Introduction
Holding Schools Accountable
Challenges
Indicators
Focus Groups
On School Report Cards
State of the States
Report Cards
Policy Updates
Indicators

transparent.gif (43 bytes)
Contents
How To Order

Read South Dakota's Policy Update.

South Dakotatransparent.gif (43 bytes)

transparent.gif (43 bytes) REPORT CARD
transparent.gif (43 bytes)
transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes) NAEP
exams
% Scoring
proficient
  • 1996 8th grade math
  • ?
  • 1996 4th grade math
  • ?
  • 1996 8th grade science
  • ?
  • 1994 4th grade reading
  • ?
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes)
    QUALITY COUNTS
    1999 grades
    transparent.gif (43 bytes)
  • Standards and assessments
  • transparent.gif (43 bytes)

  • Efforts to raise teacher quality
  • C-

  • School climate
  • Resources (funding):
  • transparent.gif (43 bytes)
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Adequacy D+
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Equity
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Allocation D+
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes)

    A fter receiving criticism last year for the generality of its standards, South Dakota went back to the drawing board and adopted new standards in language arts, math, science, and social studies. The new standards received a much more favorable rating from the American Federation of Teachers. The state could improve its grade further by developing tests aligned to the standards. The state also launched an open-enrollment policy in 1998-99 that permits students to transfer between districts. But lawmakers rejected a proposal for charter schools.

    * NOTE: The equity grade is based on 1994-95 data, the most recent available.

    ? indicates the state did not participate in national assessment, survey, or data collection.


    South Carolina

    Tennessee

    Education Week
    on the Webplease select

    © 1999 Editorial Projects in Education

    Vol. 18, number 17, page 174