please select
Quality Counts
Introduction
Holding Schools Accountable
Challenges
Indicators
Focus Groups
On School Report Cards
State of the States
Report Cards
Policy Updates
Indicators

transparent.gif (43 bytes)
Contents
How To Order

Read Iowa's Policy Update.

Iowatransparent.gif (43 bytes)

transparent.gif (43 bytes) REPORT CARD
transparent.gif (43 bytes)
transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes) NAEP
exams
% Scoring
proficient
  • 1996 8th grade math
  • 31%
  • 1996 4th grade math
  • 22%
  • 1996 8th grade science
  • 36%
  • 1994 4th grade reading
  • 35%
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes)
    QUALITY COUNTS
    1999 grades
    transparent.gif (43 bytes)
  • Standards and assessments
  • transparent.gif (43 bytes)

  • Efforts to raise teacher quality
  • School climate
  • C+
  • Resources (funding):
  • transparent.gif (43 bytes)
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Adequacy B-
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Equity
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Allocation C-
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes)

    I owa now has the distinction of being the only state not developing standards in any academic subject. But this strong local control state is cautiously moving toward demanding greater accountability from schools and districts. The state is planning to develop a set of core indicators for reporting progress on school and district report cards. Lawmakers balked, however, at enacting more high-stakes accountability provisions. Although the state approved a $10,000 pay increase for teachers who earn certification from the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, legislators rejected a requirement that prospective teachers complete an internship before earning their license.

    * NOTE: The equity grade is based on 1994-95 data, the most recent available.


    Indiana

    Kansas

    Education Week
    on the Webplease select

    © 1999 Editorial Projects in Education

    Vol. 18, number 17, page 145