please select
Quality Counts
Introduction
Holding Schools Accountable
Challenges
Indicators
Focus Groups
On School Report Cards
State of the States
Report Cards
Policy Updates
Indicators

transparent.gif (43 bytes)
Contents
How To Order

Read Colorado's Policy Update.

Coloradotransparent.gif (43 bytes)

transparent.gif (43 bytes) REPORT CARD
transparent.gif (43 bytes)
transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes) NAEP
exams
% Scoring
proficient
  • 1996 8th grade math
  • 25%
  • 1996 4th grade math
  • 22%
  • 1996 8th grade science
  • 32%
  • 1994 4th grade reading
  • 28%
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes)
    QUALITY COUNTS
    1999 grades
    transparent.gif (43 bytes)
  • Standards and assessments
  • transparent.gif (43 bytes)C-

  • Efforts to raise teacher quality
  • School climate
  • C-
  • Resources (funding):
  • transparent.gif (43 bytes)
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Adequacy
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Equity C+
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) Allocation C-
    transparent.gif (43 bytes) transparent.gif (43 bytes)

    C olorado got a middling grade on standards and assessments because its standards in math and social studies didn't pass muster with the American Federation of Teachers. The state plans to hold districts accountable for results in the future, but leaves schools out of the equation. Colorado remains at the bottom of our adequacy indicators. Last November, voters rejected a measure that would have allowed the state to spend about $1 billion in surplus revenues on schools.

    * NOTE: The equity grade is based on 1994-95 data, the most recent available.


    California

    Connecticut

    Education Week
    on the Webplease select

    © 1999 Editorial Projects in Education

    Vol. 18, number 17, page 132